Ashby vs Workable

Ashby

All-in-one recruiting platform with analytics built in

Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform that combines an applicant tracking system, scheduling, sourcing, CRM, and analytics in one product, aimed at companies that hire seriously enough to want their hiring data to answer questions. The problem it addresses is fragmentation. A typical recruiting stack is an ATS for the pipeline, a separate scheduling tool, a sourcing extension, a nurture CRM, and a business-intelligence layer bolted on to answer questions the ATS cannot - where candidates drop out, how long each stage takes, which sources produce hires rather than applications, and whether the process treats candidate groups differently. Because those tools sit in different databases, the reporting is either manual or wrong. Ashby's argument is that analytics has to be native to be trustworthy, and that is what it leads with: cohort-based funnel analysis, time-in-stage, offer-acceptance rates, and forecasting available without exporting anything. Around that sit the operational pieces a recruiting team touches hourly. Scheduling handles multi-interviewer panels across calendars and time zones, including the debrief. Structured interview kits and scorecards push interviewers toward consistent, comparable feedback rather than free-text impressions. A sourcing extension and CRM keep passive candidates warm between roles. Approval chains cover headcount and offers. Pricing is public at the entry point, which is rare in this category, and the structure has one consequence worth understanding before a trial. The Foundations plan is around $400 per month, roughly $360 on annual billing. Crucially, pricing scales with total company headcount, not with the number of recruiters using the product - so a 200-person company with two recruiters pays for 200 people. Reported bands put companies of 100 to 300 employees at roughly $30,000 to $70,000 per year and 300 to 500 employees at $60,000 to $120,000, with Enterprise quoted individually. That model is fine for a company hiring heavily relative to its size and expensive for one that is not. The company raised a Series D in July 2025 and is widely used by fast-growing technology companies. How it compares: Greenhouse is the incumbent for structured hiring and has the deeper integration marketplace; Ashby's counter is native analytics and fewer add-ons. Lever leans toward CRM-first sourcing. Workable and Recruitee are cheaper and better suited to lower-volume hiring. Rippling and other HRIS-attached ATS modules win on consolidation if you already run payroll there. Teamtailor is stronger on employer branding. It suits venture-backed and scale-up companies running structured, high-volume hiring who want one system of record and real reporting. It is oversized for a company making a handful of hires a year, where headcount-based pricing works against you.

Workable

Recruiting software with job posting and AI sourcing

Workable posts roles to hundreds of job boards, screens candidates, and manages the hiring pipeline, with an AI sourcing tool for hard-to-fill positions.